Talk:Thrombin

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jfdwolff in topic Review

20210A

edit

The 20210 mutation is 24,000 years old. JFW | T@lk 21:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

But screening of 1st degree relatives is probably not justified. JFW | T@lk 22:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

30 in the world???? That doesn't make sense! I think it must have been 30,000, or 30 million!

I just added a reference that verifies the above data. The key term is "congenital." --Sklettke 06:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Considering the reference you refer to is over a decade old at this point (not to mention the research was conducted at the onset of first learning of this disorder), I have to question the validity. I was diagnosed with the gene mutation in early 2007 and was told by the doctors that it is a very common disorder. Jonibug (talk) 01:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)JonibugReply

Discovery

edit

Who and when dicover the Thrombin? thanks, 89.139.232.219 (talk) 08:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

article reassessment

edit

I have reassessed this article as Start class, mainly because it has few if any reliable sources. I intend to begin working on it soon. It is greatly in need of attention from expert editors and any other interested editors. DiverDave (talk) 18:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why do "thrombinogen" and "thrombogen" redirect here?

edit

Not mentioned or defined in article. 109.157.79.50 (talk) 07:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Review

edit

Of thrombin actions in the interstitium doi:10.1111/jth.13191 JFW | T@lk 09:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply