Talk:Thunderstrike (Eric Masterson)

Eric as Thunderstrike

Most of the wiki covered Eric's role as Thor II with only a brief paragraph even relating to his Thunderstrike persona. As this information is already covered in the Thor (comics) wiki under Eric Masterson, I have redone the whole page focusing on his time as Thunderstrike.

--DMD 16:50, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Cleaned up again as required, see below (article is about "Thunderstrike", not "Thor") --DMD 15:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

It's about the CHARACTER. The Thor page is too long as it is, and splitting the Masterson bio between two pages is just silly and goes against precident. - SoM 17:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

It is about the character..and the name at the top is Thunderstrike. Not Eric Masterson. Not Thor II. Thunderstrike. Maybe there should be an Eric Masterson page instead so that the Thor II data and the Thunderstrike data can be put together?--DMD 04:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree with this. The Thor article is far beyond the preferred length of a wikipedia article and more than half of it seems to be minutia level plot review of the Eric Masterson period. Let's move it and the information here to one "Eric Masterson" article (which I would imagine would then need it's own cleanup and condensing, but first things first). -Markeer 14:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Ult Thor/Thunderstrike

Someone should point out that Ultimate Thor Resembles Thunderstrike more than the classic marvel Thor he is supposedly based upon.

Leon Evelake 04:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

--DMD 15:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Weather control

It states in the statistic box that he can control the weather, but in the article it says he can't. Since there is no known instance of Thunderstrike controlling the weather without Thor's power the article should be fixed accordingly.

Fair use rationale for Image:Thunderstrike.jpg

Image:Thunderstrike.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Thor-433.jpg

Image:Thor-433.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)