Excessive personal info on Marjorie Thurlow

edit

@Rangasyd and Kerry Raymond: a relative has contacted me to request removal of personal information about Marjorie Thurlow's personal life. Although it's sourced, it does look too much, since she's not the primary topic of the article. --99of9 (talk) 06:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@99of9 and Rangasyd: Fair enough. Their personal history seems largely irrelevant to the history of the house. Can someone check my diffs and see if it still hangs together. 99of9, can you check with the relatives to see they are happy. Kerry (talk) 06:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Kerry Raymond: Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 07:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@99of9 and Kerry Raymond: Agree. This content was overly excessive / personal. Thanks for bringing to our attention. I also plan to 'tone down' Harry Seidler. The fact that he's linked and there is a date attached to the development doesn't require editorial that he was "the dynamic up-and-coming young [architect]". Simply, "architect" will suffice. Rangasyd (talk) 10:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply