Talk:Thwaytes v Sotheby's

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 11 June 2023 by reviewer Hoary (talk · contribs).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Referring to the case

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Here are two among many references:

Thwaytes v Sotheby's [2015] EWHC 36, [3].
Thwaytes, [125].

Can all of this not be done via a single reference, called by the following

<ref name="TvS">''Thwaytes v Sotheby's'' (2015) EWHC 36.</ref>{{Rp|at=para 3}}
<ref name="TvS" />{{Rp|at=para 125}}

et cetera? -- Hoary (talk) 01:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I didn’t know you could do it that way. I’m currently not able to sit down and change all the references into that style but I will as soon as I can. (Or obviously feel free to do it in the meantime). Thanks! Jtrrs0 (talk) 09:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic