This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Livy 34.42, as cited in the article, states that this Tiberius Sempronius Longus's father was consul in the first year of the 2nd Punic War. Livy 21.15 states that the consuls of that year, 218 BCE, were P. Cornelius and Ti. Sempronius (quo P. Cornelius Ti. Sempronius consules fuerunt). According to Wikipedia Roman Naming Conventions, P. = Publius and Ti. = Tiberius, while T. = Titus. Furthermore, Polybius 3.41] calls the consul of 218 Τεβέριος (Tiberius). On the basis of these, the original sources, is it not correct to change the name of the father to Tiberius Sempronius Longus. Amphipolis15:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
The sources cited in the other article (Plb. 3.41; Livy 21.15,23.37) give the name as either Τεβέριος (Tiberius) or Ti. According to Wikipedia Roman Naming Conventions, Ti. = Tiberius. Names from Roman coins confirm this. This coin from the reign of emperor Tiberius has TICAESAR for Tiberius Caesar (see bottom of scanned page), whereas this coin from the reign of emperor Titus has TCAESIMP for Titus Caesar Imperator (see middle of scanned page). We shall seee what the administrators think as a move has been requested. Once that is decided, then this too is decided. But I want to ask, why "regardless of what Wikipedia's naming conventions"? I cited it not as Wikipedia's rules, but the article about how Roman's abbreviated names. There is confusion in the names sometimes, especially between M' (Manius) and M. (Marcus). But one would expect that they got the names on the imperial coins correct. Tacitus and Suetonius both call the second emperor Tiberius. It makes sense then that on coins they would use abbreviations to save space. So coins from Tiberius's reign with "Ti." on them seem to support the idea that Ti=Tiberius. So, why do you disregard that convention?--Amphipolis16:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
