This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Walter, I didnt call it a sales-only website. I said it was being used to sell lyric sheets in this instance. It is not a neutral third party that lists lyrics. It has an agreement woth Bethel Music that the lyrics can be there in order to sell them as a product. They aren't an expert in their field either and once again the citation adds nothing to the article and doesnt serve the purpose of supporting a paragraph. I really shouldn't have to explain it to you. Once again, simply restating my comment as a justification for reverting me is not a valid. What rule etc are basing leaving it there on? What neccesary piece of supporting information does it add to the article? Maybe if there was actual qoute from a notable piece of the lyrics the article then it would make sense. But there isin't even any context the citations. Let alone, the whole rule about how not everything related to the topic is notable, or the rule about how Wikipedia is not a websites of lists..You simply saying they are acceptable without providing evidence is an oppinion. I just gave you like three of why they arent. For someone that capitulates so much about rules, guidelines, and clarity you sure seem to disregard those things when you have an oppertunity.
