Talk:Tigris

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comments

edit

Propaganda

edit

Incorrect details. Per the article: "The Tigris is 1,750 km (1,090 mi) long, rising in the Taurus Mountains of eastern Turkey". It is not considered a part of the Armenian Highlands and as such, neither the Taurus Mountains article or this article mentions it. And telll me how the fuck Turkey's mid important while an imaginary country is marked as high importance.

Kurdish Deletion

edit

"In Kurdish there are a number of words related to Tigris. Tîr means arrow, Tîrik means rolling pin, Tûj means sharp, Tirs means to scare (Someone with a sharp item threatening), Tirş means sour (Meaning that it has a sharp taste), Dijmin means enemy (Probably means someone with a sharp item), Diran means teeth, Dirî means horn, Dirêj means cool, Derzî means needle, Dezî means thin string, Pirç means whore, Dar means wood, Kîr means penis, and Zirav means thin.

By looking at these words it is highly likely that the word Tigris might have originated from Kurdish which an Indo-European language. The name of Tigris might have passed to Greek from Kurdish. Tigris means Tiger in Greek. The letter ‘J’ doesn’t exist in Greek therefore it is replaced by a ‘G’, for example, in Kurdish ‘woman’ means JYN, in Greek it means GYN-i. There is a change between the letters J and G. Plus, in Greek –is connex is added to ends of words. Keeping these in mind; Tigris might have come from the root word ‘Tîjîr’. It is higly probably these words are of Kurdish origin looking at the words above. In Kurdish 'Jehr' means poison. Tîrjîr then means poisonous arrow. The words listed above all have a common origin and they all possess similar meanings. They signify something that is long, thin, sharp and fast just like the Tigris River.

All these words possess the characteristic of the Tigris River. Tîr-Tîrik-Tûj-Tirs-Dijmin-Dirî-Dirêj-Tîjîr-Tîrjîr-Tigris

Xenophon BC 401 mentions Carduchi people when passing near the Tigris River who attached his army of 10.000 soldiers. He mentions that Carduchi people had arrows that were too big and strong which went through the shields of his soldiers. Carduchi people seems to be the Kurds of Kurdistan."

Etymology

edit

This etymological discussion is simply wrong in so many ways:

The Greek name tigris comes from the Old Persian word for "tiger" and means "the fast one". It might also be argued to come from Kurdish too. In Kurdish "Tir" means arrow. This means that the river is quick and fast like an arrow.Tîj-Tûj means sharp, pointing and cutting. Since the letter "j" doesn't exist in Greek Tîj-Tûj became Tig later Tigr.In Greek at the end of words -is sonex is used (Tîj-Tijr-Tig-Tigr-Tigris).

First of all, the Persian for "tiger" is babr, not tigr or anything like it. The Greek word "tigris" meaning "tiger" may be related to Persian words within the same family as "*tigr", but that is not the Persian meaning of the words.

Second, the Kurdish (and Farsi) word for "arrow", tir, comes from Middle Persian tigr -- which also means "arrow".

Third, the word tij (or rather tiz) "sharp" is certainly related to tigr, but they belong to the same word family -- they are not the same word.

I'll try to come up with something better.

the word is probably come from tigris,both means TIZ[sharp] and also flooding river[toghian in persian],which is also adjective of tiger[ i mean toghianger] ,both tiger and tigris and tiz and tigh and tir are from the same origins,the word for tiger in old persian has been tigris and the new word "babr" is from 'turko mongolian" root. reference , book:IRANVICH by DR bahram frahvashi.,even the word arvand is synonym of tigris, Spitman 21:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Malayo-Polynesian seafarers

edit

The Sumerian names for the Tigris and Euphrates appear to have a word correspondence in sound and meaning to words in Malayo-Polynesian, a language spoken by an ancient seafaring people who sailed the Pacific and Indian oceans, and even settled the island of Madagascar near Africa. In some Malayo-Polynesian languages spoken in the Philippines and Indonesia, the word siglat, which means "swift," "fast" or "rapid," appears similar to the Sumerian name Idigna and the Akkadian name Idiglat for the Tigris. The Malayo-Polynesian word burakan, which means "wave," "wavy," or "surf" appears similar to the Sumerian name Buranun and Akkadian name Pu-rat-tu for the Euphrates. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Batobalani (talkcontribs) 03:24, 13 June 2006.

This is a fringe theory that violates Wikipedia's rules on no original research, verifiability and reliable sources. That is why it was removed from the article. If you want it included in the article, you will have to make sure that it meets the criteria set out in the policies and guidelines above. — Gareth Hughes 09:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply



The flow of the Tigris "might" decrease. I believe the flow has substantially decreased - to the point of salination. Saddam threatened to blow up the Turkish dams - one reason for war. Iraq was being attacked by the USA and allies by "other means" long before we ever heard of Saddam " the evil one". Water is a main reason to fight in the middle East - Jordan River, Golun ( Sea of Galilee ), Litani ( southern Lebanon, etc. This is kept hidden from most Americans - the real value of controlling the media ( control the discussion - kind of like a moderator ).

NPOV in discussion of US actions

edit

I don't really doubt the facts we're currently presenting regarding the effects of US war actions and reconstruction efforts. But it does seem to me that we could present the facts in a more credible way. As it stands, we state as a fact (without citation!) that the US-led forces destroyed the water treatment plants in the first war. This is entirely plausible, but is a significant enough claim that it can and should be backed up with a citation.

Then we say that the US-led coalition CLAIMS to have made progress in improving water supplies in Iraq, but we cast doubt on that claim with the additional (weasly OR) comment that nobody has independently verified such progress. We provide a citation that superficially appears to be supporting the lack of independent verification--but in fact the citation is simply referring to USAID's web site in which they brag about what they've accomplished. Is it true that nobody has independently observed USAID's progress in rebuilding Iraq's water infrastructure? If so, we should have an adequate citation for that. If we can't find a citation for it, simply saying "USAID reports having made progress" will be sufficient--any reader with a critical mind will know how much faith they can put in that source, without our editorializing on its plausibility.

As it stands, this reads like anti-US propaganda. I'm an American who opposed the war from the start and has continued to protest in the streets against it, so I'm not naturally inclined to believe everything the US government tells me, or to take a rosy view of what my country has done to Iraq, but as written this article gives the impression of serious bias.

65.213.77.129 (talk) 13:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

How's it now? -- Zsero (talk) 14:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Better, with regard to the NPOV language, but we still have no cited source for the statement regarding the destruction from the first Gulf War. 65.213.77.129 (talk) 19:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
No source has appeared after eight months, so I'm deleting:
Coalition forces destroyed Iraq's water treatment plants during the 1990 Gulf War, affecting the water quality of the Tigris.
Feel free to reinsert it with an appropriate citation--it seems like a plausible fact, and if true is certainly worthy of inclusion in the article! 65.213.77.129 (talk) 17:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

WHICH WAY DO THE TIGRIS AND EUPHRATES RIVERS FLOW?

edit

PLEASE I WANT TO KNOW WHICH WAY THE TIGRIS AND EUPHRATES RIVERS FLOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE ANSWER ME!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.104.185 (talk) 13:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC) == Souce of the TigrisReply

In the collier's encyclopedia and other text sources the armenian highlands are indicated as the origen of the euphrates and the tigris  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.131.174.181 (talk) 17:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply 

"Cadavers being dumped in river"

edit

This whole bit at the end of the "Management and Water Quality" section needs a reference. Madritor (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Huge picture... page broken for me

edit

92.29.90.118 seems to have made an edit adding a huge picture which takes all the room. 88.159.72.240 (talk) 20:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. Looks like vandalism as Assyria is not an existing state. Zoeperkoe (talk) 20:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Religion and mythology

edit

I have reinstated part of this section (deleted 6 July 2010 because it was "mostly unsourced and irrelevant for actual river"). Wrt "mostly unsourced", I left out an unsourced bit and added a link to the Kumarbi Cycle. As for "irrelevant for actual river", Wikipedia contains many natural physical features, and in many cases, with associated religious, legendary or mythological status. This is an encyclopaedia, not a geographers' reference book. The Lesser Merlin (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Added Kurdish name to infobox

edit

Just like the Euphrates article, it's ridiculous that the Kurdish name should be given such disregard given the river's course through the centre of Kurdistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZanLJackson (talkcontribs) 13:48, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply


First Steamers

General Francis Rawdon Chesney hauled 2 steamers overland through Syria in 1836, to explore the possibility of an overland and river route to India. One steamer was wrecked in a storm which sank and killed twenty adventurers. Chesney proved the river navigable to powered craft.

The Euphrates and Tigris Steam Navigation Company was established in 1861 by the Lynch Brothers trading company. They had 2 steamers in service. By 1908 ten steamers were on the river. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.7.23.169 (talk) 23:41, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

tigris and eurphates rivers

edit

What are the advantages and disadvantages of flooding to the Tigris and Euphrates rivers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.187.65 (talk) 23:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Guffa on the Tigris.JPG Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Guffa on the Tigris.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Guffa on the Tigris.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Tigris river never ends — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.29.211.251 (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tigris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply