Talk:Tijuana River
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SaraVilma (talk) 20:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SaraVilma, Lucerosanchez.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Initial assessment
editA notch above stub. what do others think about the importance ranking ? Mid or High ? Anlace 02:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
New Section
editThe article summarizes the Tijuana River describing its physical attributes and recreational aspects very well. I think the page would benefit from a "History" section. This would provide users with some background as to how and why the river is regulated (perhaps its ecological history as well --this has changed over the past decade) and what agencies are responsible for regulations. Its history section, in a neutral stance, should address the trans-border policies enacted to maintain public health and ecological sustainability. SaraVilma (talk) 20:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)saravilma Something that can benefit the new history section is information on the 1944 United States-Mexico treaty that dealt with flood precautions in the Tijuana river and the 1966 treaty that followed it. This section should include the actions of both the U.S and Mexico, mexico complied but San Diego was in opposition. The lack of a history section means the page is missing vital information on the river. This section can also tie in to the waste water section by including information on the state of emergencies called in 2016 and 2017 Lucerosanchez (talk) 23:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
A new section that dealt with the policy surrounding the wastewater management and flooding issues would be helpful and inform the public on what has or can be done. This section can deal with the conflict between the United States and Mexico and the implementation of treaties that have been drawn by the two countries. This importance should be stressed by emphasizing the economic and ecological harm that is being caused by the pollution present in the river.This section can inform the public on who has jurisdiction in this kind of situtation. The section could provide background on how the House of Representatives and the Environment and Public Works Committee of the U.S. Senate need to deal with international conflicts. Lucerosanchez (talk) 21:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Water Treatment
editThis section should include current initiatives in recovering from the recent water contamination. Although this is a bi-national issue, information can be found on the California Environmental Protection Agency website detailing current goals in recovery, for example "In 2015, a Five-Year Action Plan was released that identifies the projects the Recovery Team aspires to accomplish over the next five years to continue advancing the Recovery Strategy goals". This is information that would benefit the public, especially if the next portion refers to water activities. SaraVilma (talk) 20:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)saravilma
More information is needed on the effects of the pollution the Tijuana River is generating. Further research can be added on the ecological impacts, considering the river has estuaries and reserves. The levels of bacteria in the river are more than normal but mexico argues that the necessary salinity is actually being maintained by the wastewater. Information on the indigenous species and how they have been affected could be useful. The last information cited was from March 2017, any information that is more recent may provide new information and updates on what has happened after then. Lucerosanchez (talk) 21:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
The sewage spill was greatly detailed in explaining the consequences on the American side and a note was added expressing what the mayor had said in regards to the spill. Mayor Serge Dedina stating it was "deliberate" distracts from the article seeing as that is a very charged comment. The comment was cited from Fox News, a valid news source but not necessarily partial to the issue on the water treatment. SaraVilma (talk) 23:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC) SaraVilma
Recreation
editExternal links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tijuana River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070608080208/http://fs.sdsu.edu/kf/reserves/trnerr/ to http://fs.sdsu.edu/kf/reserves/trnerr/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070608080208/http://fs.sdsu.edu/kf/reserves/trnerr/ to http://fs.sdsu.edu/kf/reserves/trnerr/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
References to be used
editReliable source for December 2018 sewage spill
editReliable sources for potential updating of Water treatment section
edit- https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2023/12/04/san-diegos-border-sewage-problem-may-get-better-soon
- https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/toxic-tide-the-sewage-crisis-at-the-border/3391666/
- https://calmatters.org/commentary/2023/11/san-diego-tijuana-river-sewage/
- https://voiceofsandiego.org/2022/08/02/lots-of-tijuanas-sewage-is-crossing-the-border-right-now-heres-why/
- https://phys.org/news/2023-08-senators-millions-tijuana-sewage-crisis.html