Talk:Tijuca National Park
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 28 March 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was proposed in this section that Tijuca Forest be renamed and moved to Tijuca National Park.
result: Links: current log • target log
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
Tijuca Forest → Tijuca National Park – To me it makes more sense to have the article on the (well-defined) National Park (NP) rather than the (poorly-defined) Forest.
The NP seems to be referred to more both in English and Portuguese (pt-wiki redirects from Forest to NP). The UNESCO page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1100 refers exclusively to the NP, Brazilian government websites use it more (compare: https://www.gov.br/pt-br/@@search?SearchableText=%22Parque+Nacional+da+Tijuca%22 to https://www.gov.br/pt-br/@@search?SearchableText=%22Floresta+da+Tijuca%22) , and a google maps search for 'Tijuca Forest' will take you to 'Tijuca National Park' in both languages. If anyone has more sources that would provide insight, I would appreciate it.
It can be said that the NP and Forest are not exactly equivalent (eg, there are forested areas not in the park boundaries), but to me it makes more sense to have the NP as the main article. Cobbunt (talk) 04:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom. BD2412 T 05:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)