Talk:Tilehurst

Article scope

I wonder whether it might be better to have separate articles for the civil parish and for Tilehurst Within. WikiProject UK Geography's policy is to have an article for each individual civil parish. Alternatively, the article could be revised to concentrate on the civil parish, while mentioning Tilehurst Within in a distinct section. Skinsmoke (talk) 17:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Or a third option would be to have articles at Tilehurst, West Berkshire and Tilehurst, Reading. Skinsmoke (talk) 18:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Culture

I added Tilehurst SDC which has danced in Tilehurst, whicle also raising money for local charities, since 1989. I forgot to log in first so I'm just noting here who did it in case anyone has a query. Shannock9 (talk) 00:38, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tilehurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120509152107/http://www.reading.gov.uk/meetings/wards/ to http://www.reading.gov.uk/meetings/wards/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121120035942/http://www.reading.gov.uk/electionsdata/2012/local/staticscoreboard.asp to http://www.reading.gov.uk/electionsdata/2012/local/staticscoreboard.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 30 November 2017 (UTC)