Talk:Tim Bennett
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
17:32:28, 25 April 2018 review of submission by Magdalena Wisniowska
edit
Dear Legacypac,
I would be interested to know which references/citations you found particularly objectionable on my Tim Bennett draft wikipedia page. As sources, they are all secondary, the publishers are reputable and they consist of more than two paragraphs about Bennett's work. Tim Bennett is a well known contemporary artist in Munich and I write this as someone who works in the field (with a doctorate in visual culture) but unconnected with the artist (I encountered the artist's work during an Art Research conference, where all work was peer-reviewed). The artist's catalogues are part of the German National Library.
Artists less well known than Bennett, and also based here in Munich, have their own wikipedia page, for example, Benjamin Bergmann, with a comparable amount of secondary sources.
Thank you in advance for your help, Kind Regards, M
Magdalena Wisniowska (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm going to accept based on this. It was an edge case in my mind anyway. Legacypac (talk) 21:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Lead section
editThis has now be adjusted. (Magdalena Wisniowska (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC))