This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As the creator of this page I'm surprised to see it recommended for speedy deletion. I'm happy to rewrite it to avoid it being 'promotional'. Is anyone able to point out what is promotional about the article? -Joshuacouch (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
I don't see a neutrality issue with the prose, although sometimes editors get a bit trigger happy with articles that don't clearly meet notability guidelines. Some of the sources are themselves at least partially promotional and should be replaced with better ones if possible, but I think that marking this for G11 speedy deletion was not the correct call. signed, Rosguilltalk23:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
While I think that there's enough secondary content outside of pure Q&A across the interview articles to let this article out of the new pages queue, the article as written doesn't cleanly establish that the subject meets WP:GNG. signed, Rosguilltalk23:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
