Talk:Time of arrival
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Synchronization
editIs synchronization really needed for TDoA? With multilateration I think it is definitly not needed. Whereas one could say with ToA, knowing an absolute time on the sender and on the receiver implies synchronization. --ThyMYthOS (talk) 12:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
For TDoA, sender and receiver do not need to be synchronised, however, the receivers have to be accurately synchronized with each other for the calculated time difference of arrival to have any meaning. --Spuzzdawg (talk) 06:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
introduction
editThis article has several errors. Time of arrival is not the same as time of flight as a literal reading of the words indicate. More serious is the error in the second and third sentences: the speed of light in a vacuum is not a function of carrier frequency.
In the GPS-related literature that I am familiar with either term TOA or TDOA can be used to identify the general principle of operation. For example you could say GPS uses TOA or TDOA techniques by measuring (a biased) TOA and then solving systems of either N TOA equations or N-1 TDOA equations. There are lots of proofs in the literature that either system gives the same answer. The receiver and transmitter do not require time synchronization because the receiver clock error is a solution variable. There are many GPS books that would be good to reference here since GPS is where most people encounter TOA/TDOA techniques.
-- jjmason — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Time of arrival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070510132834/http://www.crypto.rub.de/its_seminar_ss07.html to http://www.crypto.rub.de/its_seminar_ss07.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)