Talk:Timeline of Norse colonization of the Americas

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Norse history and culture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Little Ice Age#Northern Hemisphere|Little Ice Age]] Anchor Little Ice Age#Northern Hemisphere links to a specific web page: Northern Hemisphere. The anchor (#Northern Hemisphere) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

11-21-05

Added the tags 'historical, ahistorical and mythological' to the timeline as a thumbnail reference to mainstram archaeology and unproven hypothesis. Please do not turn the timeline istself into a discussion about the nature and validity of 'accepted archaeology'. If you have to justify it, odds are you've already lost the battle.

This is not to disparage emerging ideas (or ideas currently without sufficient evidence). This is simply to show the current breadth of knowledge of mainstream archaeology. As an encyclopedia it is as essential to illustrate this distinction as it is to be fully rounded in various schools of thought.

Lastly, I'm not entirely comfortable with the distinction between mythological and ahistorical, as it overlaps far too frequently. I would enjoy a discussion and further refinement of these terms.

Hewhocaves— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hewhocaves (talk • contribs) 12:58, November 21, 2005 (UTC)

Some entries are tagged as both 'historical' and 'ahistorical'. I understand that A and M overlap, but A and H? Turly-burly 08:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

early dates on archaeological findings are an excellent example. As archaeologists discover sites, carbon and radioactive dating systems (among others) provide confirming evidence for some types of materials. Generally, although all dating systems have inherent flaws, findings using these systems are designated as "evidence" (historical). Other materials, such as lithic tools not associated with carbon bearing hearths or datable animal remains, are much more difficult to date. Speculation and best guess ("ahistorical") comes into play here until (hopefully) the initial findings are confirmed in other sites which can be more firmly dated. Clovis culture was considered the oldest known American people for most of the 20th century -- but several new sites, dating methods and theories are starting to push this date backwards. There is some datable proof (historical)for these claims, but most is educated speculation or isolated finds awaiting confirmation (ahistorical). So I belive both designations would be appropriate here. WBardwin 19:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Mythological information belongs on a seperate page, if at all. I left it in pending a counter-argument 24.218.46.54

But.........the difficulty comes in defining "myth." One man's myth is another man's truth. Distinguishing levels of provable contact is why the article has established categories. Best wishes. WBardwin 02:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Why include the Mormon stuff? It is something we know for a fact is recent fiction, whereas the most of the other mythological stuff is ancient and/or may actually be true. --Peter Lund/82.143.195.114 12:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's notable, whether it's true or not, just like the other stuff.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

7th century (A) Fleeing Rome to escape barbarian invasions, the descendants of ancient Liburnian navigators from northern Adriatic sail by Gibraltar and Western Ocean to 'Westlands' called Semeray. Can the person who wrote this tell me where did he get it thank you.Miloti

Timelines are very important to the subject matter. The Egyptian pyramids, for example, predate the Mesoamerican ones by a thousand years or more. Architectural similarities don't add up to much with such time gaps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrKen (talk • contribs) 15:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic