Talk:Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season

Featured listTimeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 27, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
August 18, 2008Featured list candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

TZ

edit

I'd propose changing the times for Delta to WET as well - JVG 13:58, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Since it didn't make landfall as a tropical cyclone, I don't think that's necessary. --Golbez 15:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Edit: Hm, since it did cause significant effects to the Canary Islands, it should use their time zone. --Golbez 23:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
We've always used the times given by the NHC, I think we should stick to them. NSLE (讨论+extra) 00:15, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but Vince and Delta could be considered unusual circumstances, since storms almost always only ever impact Atlantic, Eastern, and Central time zones. --Golbez 03:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Todo

edit

References needed. For a "list of facts" like this article, the references are especially important. Jdorje 08:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think that is adressed now...--Nilfanion (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

TS 27?

edit

Should we make mention of "TS 27" - the early strengthening of Tropical Storm Gamma - in this timeline? —Cuiviénen (Cuivië) 04:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

That's probably a good idea.... Should I just go and add it? --AySz88^-^ 18:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Post-season changes

edit

This timeline has only been updated piecemeal with the data from the TCRs. For instance the incorrect operational downgrade of Epsilon is mentioned (as an aside does the timeline even need to mention the NHC got it wrong?) but things like the subtropical phase of Vince have been missed. As this is a timeline of the season and not the advisories, if the reanalysis changes things, do we really need to say 'after reanalysis' on each alteration? -- Nilfanion 14:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I added entries about the unnamed subtropical storm, since the track was officially released on the NHC post-season track map. I didn't add any notes about landfall, pending the TCR. I cited the report page on the entries. --Coredesat 00:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Good Article nomination has failed

edit

The Good article nomination for Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season has failed, for the following reason:

This is really more a list than an article. You may want to try WP:FL instead. cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Figured as much, I think there should be a GL procedure.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

To do

edit
  • Strip date wiki-linking
  • Provide metric/imperial conversion for all units.
  • Wiki-link the first instance of all units
  • Add non-breaking spaces in the usual places.
  • Remove multiple wikilinks to the same article (e.g. Mexico has about 40 links)
  • Consider whether the bold text for landfalls and upgrades is appropriate. Revise if necessary
  • Does the chart belong above the lead?
  • Publication dates for references
  • Beef up the lead
  • Most Featured Lists are in tables. Does this whole article need to be put into massive tables or can it follow the example of Timeline of chemistry?
  • Pictures

Plasticup T/C 17:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jose TCR (PDF) was published before the storm? I assume Franklin wrote the wrong year, but I'm not sure how to handle his mistake. Plasticup T/C 01:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Same for Delta. Plasticup T/C 02:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Zeta was never called Tropical Depression Thirty. That fact needs to be fixed. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Not sure what else can be done with the article... A-Class review seems to be the highest possible state for the article. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 22:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 22:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply