Wikipedia

Talk:Timeline of the Unification Church

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Started article

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just started the article by pasting in text from Unification Church. I will work on it some more and, of course, welcome anyone who wants to contribute. Steve Dufour (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Opposition section.

edit

My first idea is to make this section more concise. The ideas of "brainwashing" and "target of anti-cult movement" both belong in one sentence. Then we can think about adding material about the theological opposition, so that we're not just concentrating on the anti-cult movement.Dulcimer music 19:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)JDefauw — Preceding unsigned comment added by JDefauw (talk • contribs)

Merger proposal

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago10 comments6 people in discussion

I've proposed merging this article and Timeline of Sun Myung Moon. The personal story of Rev. Moon and the history of the church are intertwined and there is much duplication between the two articles, both of which are secondary to the two main articles anyway. One history or timeline showing the dates of important events would probably be more useful to interested readers. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, do it. This sort of stuff is much better merged into the church article, not the bio article, which already contains all the really biographically salient information. -- The Anome (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Let's see what other people say. I informed everyone who worked on this article, plus some people who worked on the other ones.Steve Dufour (talk) 16:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Merge & salt the earth - Going beyond this single case, the interrelated series of Unification articles are not cleanly and clearly organized so that the encyclopedia's users can find what they are looking for and in context. Did you know that the Unification Church has TWO entries at the List of new religious movements? And how many sub & SPLIT articles? I like what Bahá'í Faith has done on that article - there is a great navigation box that allows for easy access on the topics related to the faith. I propose something like that, to bring the information together. EBY (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
List of new religious movements is the project of a certain, how should I put it, overly zealous editor who is no longer editing NRM related articles. If you remove the duplicate listings no one would object, I'm sure. BTW Scientology (founded the same year as the UC and with 50,000 to 100,000 members world-wide) has a network of several hundreds of articles, templates, categories, etc. here. (I am topic-banned as well as self-banned so I can't do anything there.)  :-) -Steve Dufour (talk) 05:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • I also support the merge, and as EBY said there are other spin-off articles that could be merged back to the main articles. The UC template that is now at the bottom of most articles seems to work okay. What is the advantage of navigation boxes on the side of articles? Kitfoxxe (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Just an idea, not attached to my Merge !vote. The idea of something that would ease navigation through the many moving parts of this subject is attractive.EBY (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Future events

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I took off the predictions of future church plans since, as a member, I happen to know that church sponsorship of many projects is being reduced and these events may not happen. Of course when secondary sources report this it can be added to the article. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

POV

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Note that the lead mentions controversy and criticism but this is not covered in any detail in the body of the article, despite sources being available in the footnotes. A controversy section seems appropriate given the negative attention the subject has received. Flat Out (talk) 05:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't see the point of a controversy section on a timeline. Of course more controversial events could be added.Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:38, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Timeline of the Unification Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_of_the_Unification_Church&oldid=1247501707"