Talk:Timothy Everest/GA2

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:34, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:36, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Also working with Nutter at this time was Catherine (now an actress and film producer), whom Everest later married. Catherine who? Does she have a surname?
      Done diff. I have, as yet, been unable to discover Catherine Everest's maiden name. Daicaregos (talk) 10:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
    His long-standing association with Marks and Spencer began that year (see below). I don't think the "(see below)" is necessary, not very encyclopaedic.
      Done diff. Daicaregos (talk) 10:47, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
    I made a number of copy-edits.[1]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    "dressed some of the world's most famous people". and "bespoke casual movement". all quotes need attribution and citation.
      Done diff 1, diff 2, diff 3 and diff 4. Daicaregos (talk) 10:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Everest joined DAKS Simpson (a well-respected name in British fashion) as design consultant in May 2000 "(a well-respected name in British fashion)" needs attribution
      Done diff 1, diff 2. Daicaregos (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
    I removed an EL that is used as a reference, as per WP:EL.[2]
    Other references appear RS, no OR detected.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Good coverage, no unnecessary trivia
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Images licensed and captioned
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    On hold for seven days for the issues above to be addressed. I note that large parts of the article are cited to WP:Primary sources, it would be good to find alternates especially where the statements are about other people. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
    OK, I think this now meets the criteria so I am happy to list it. If you develop the article further you may want to look for other sources, but primary sources are Ok for statements by the subject about himself. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Please let me know which statements you would like further sources for - I'll try to find them. Thanks, Daicaregos (talk) 13:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply