 | A fact from Titulus pictus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Romans would advertise their goods with a type of inscription known as Titulus pictus? Source: Pena, J. Theodore (November 4, 2021), Pecci, Alessandra; Leitch, Victoria; Bonifay, Michel; Bernal-Casasola, Darío (eds.), "The reuse of transport amphorae as packaging containers in the Roman world: an overview", Roman Amphora Contents: Reflecting on the Maritime Trade of Foodstuffs in Antiquity, Berkeley: University of California, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198748489.003.0011, ISBN 978-019-874-848-9, retrieved August 28, 2022.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/CLODO
5x expanded by Graearms (talk). Self-nominated at 18:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC).
Expanded 5x four days ago, so new and long enough. Thoroughly cited, neutrally phrased, no copyvio or plagiarism detected. Hook is cited in-line and is niche but interesting enough to pass muster here. QPQ done. Side-note to Graearms: you may wish to alphabetize the bibliography. Good to go for DYK. Topshelver (talk) 21:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Reference errors
editThere are many reference formatting errors in this article. I have done my best to clean them up, but without access to the sources I cannot fix them all. See User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors.js for a useful script to help identify these. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Graearms, I have fixed two more reference errors. I would also recommend using a script to highlight errors, Category:Harv and Sfn template errors lists Trappist's script and also User:Svick/HarvErrors.js. TSventon (talk) 07:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- TSventon I installed that script and used it too fix errors in the citations. I believe by now I fixed all of the errors on this page, and several more. Graearms (talk) 00:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)