Talk:To Heart 2/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Demize (talk · contribs) 01:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: As the majority of the references used appear to be Japanese, this review will mostly look at the other aspects of the article. I'll try to be harder on them than I normally would, and I will also converse with the nominator about the references if I feel it's necessary. demize (t · c) 01:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

The Review

There were some issues that I discussed with Cloud668, the nominator and the major contributor to the article, on IRC (Rizon). Logs can be provided if anybody wants them.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Good article overall.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   A lot of listing of things, but this is due to the content rather than the writing. Also, I ran AWB on this for genfixes/typos and none were found.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All the sources appear to be good: there are a couple well-known magazines; the publisher's and developer's websites; and Anime News Network, a well-known English source of information on the topics of Anime and Japanese Video games.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   While there could be more screenshots, they are not necessary and likely would not add much to the article.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I do believe that this article meets the Good Article standards. Congratulations! demize (t · c) 03:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! -- クラウド６６８ 04:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)