This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Both the "Message" and "Analysis" Section come across as non-NPOV. (I recognize that the article is almost entirely a translation of the Spanish wikipedia article and that what is correct Spanish comes across as circumlocution and argumentation in English). I will have a crack at improving them. Fiachra10003 (talk) 14:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Those sections discuss the author's depiction in the novel. The author and his works are political, therefore discussion of the work needs to explain his vision, whether or not it is correct. Maybe you are thinking of purely linguistic turns of phrase to make sure the author's view is not conflated with the article's, that's fine, but his views must be put forward nevertheless. Coolazice (talk) 03:02, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply