This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why leave out Bower's most important work?
editMr. Bower's first two books were and are classics of the WWII era events.
"Blind Eye to Murder" is deeply researched tale of failure, fraud and deceit of the Allies dealings with the German murderers after WWII. The Allies allowed their prejudices and bigotry to override their own clearly expressed goal of capturing, trying and punishing the Nazis leaders, and the underlings who did the killing. It is a book you all should read. Even today our US Govt. is deceiving its citizens and its also apparent the UK Govt. is NO different.
"Klaus Barbie: the Butcher of Lyon" is a compelling portrait of a diseased human given the power of life or death over a conquered population. Barbie, a Gestapo officer, relentlessly pursued the soldiers of the French Résistance, killing and torturing at will. The appellation "the Butcher" was well and truly earned. The US CIC in postwar Germany, hired and paid this murderer to work for us and protected Barbie from French courts and assisted his escape from justice to South America.
Two fine books that only merit a listing in Bower's publishing history? Poor! Hesweeney (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
That was 25 June 2013. It is now, 2014, and still no reply. Why does it seem that, in relation to matters reflecting badly on US policy, Wikipedia will not answer? Should be interesting to see if they will now reply - watch this space.
78.147.82.46 (talk) 09:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- This talk page is very rarely looked at, and so the first message has probably been forgotten about. You can write the section yourself using appropriate references. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Tom Bower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029191259/http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/entertainment/articles/2011-04/05/gq-books-how-to-write-biography-tom-bower-bernie-ecclestone to http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/entertainment/articles/2011-04/05/gq-books-how-to-write-biography-tom-bower-bernie-ecclestone
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140225233341/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/27564 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/27564
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140129030714/http://www.faber.co.uk/content/branson-behind-the-mask-tom-bower to http://www.faber.co.uk/content/branson-behind-the-mask-tom-bower
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
First wife?
editHe has been married twice. I think that should be on the record. Valetude (talk) 12:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, feel free to add it if you can find a source (or add a source here and one of us can add it if you prefer) Bellowhead678 (talk) 20:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)