Talk:Tom King (writer)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Fayenatic london in topic Page history
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tom King (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tom King (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Which photo is a better choice for the Infobox?

edit

I'd like to hear your opinions. Nightscream (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • 1 or 3 I'm not a fan of the shadows in 2, but I have no strong opinion between the other two. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • 1 because it is warmer and you can see his eyes better. In 2 and 3, there is all that stark light and dark going on.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:10, 22 Feinbruary 2019 (UTC)

  • 3 is evenly & well lit enough, background is not really distracting,(Nightscream asked me to opine here.) I don't know this guy from Adam!

Lexein (talk) 05:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Page history

edit

The page previously at Tom King (writer) was moved to Tom King (children's TV writer). – Fayenatic London 07:54, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply