Talk:Tom Knight (scientist)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disambig suggestion
editDo we really need an entry or mention of a university radio station manager? --Maru (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- Why mention an MIT professor then? Technically, you cant allow certain people to be mentioned and others not to be, its all or nothing. If you want to restrict it then it defeats the point of wikipedia, it is a valid entry if the professor is a valid entry. --User:Tektonnic
- The MIT professor is here because he was really important in several areas of Compuer Scientist, from Unix to AI. I came to this page looking for him. A radio station manager is not interesting in the least bit- what has that Tom Knight done? The article cannot adduce even the least bit- it only includes the bare fact of his existence. --Maru (talk) 19:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
I'm on the wall, this article should lead straight to the MIT professor but should have a link to the station manager. A disambiguation page is not needed because there is only 2 people. Cokehabit 13:16, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Out of date?
editI think TK has left MIT. He's only listed as an "affiliate" in the MIT online directory, and AIUI that means not employed by MIT. Jar354 (talk) 15:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
vanity page?
editthis page is very badly written with almost no biographical details, his place of birth, his age, his alumnus, family, photos, nothing. It might be a really half arsed vanity page or it might just be a really poorly written wikipedia page... though after linking here from 'synthetic biology' I tend to think the former rather than the latter. 124.168.164.201 (talk) 04:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
assessment
editstart class per ores https://ores.wmflabs.org/v2/scores/enwiki/wp10/789669704 Brock-brac (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)