Wikipedia

Talk:Tornado outbreak of April 9–11, 2009

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Section for Mena tornado?

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Due to the substantial amount of damage caused by this storm, I think a section would be useful for it. Once the NWS finishes their assessment it could probably be worked out quickly. Cyclonebiskit 20:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Probably, but I don't have enough information to split it off. CrazyC83 (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'll see what I can find. Cyclonebiskit 20:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
[1] That has a lot of information on the tornado in it. Also, a google news search gives about 1,400 articles for it. Cyclonebiskit 21:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 11

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Tomorrow could be a split-event, with tornadoes possible both on the Atlantic coast (Florida) and in West Texas from the second system (setting up Sunday and Monday). If tornadoes happen tomorrow from both systems, they should be listed as separate events. CrazyC83 (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Arson

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

One of the wildfires was apparently an arson. If this is primarily the case, then I don't believe the wildfires should be mentioned in this article if it wasn't caused by the storm system. [2] Showtime2009 (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

There have been dozens of other wildfires from northern Oklahoma to western Texas because of the winds and the dryline - so I think it should have its own section, maybe unless someone started an article but even then. The one possible arson fire did not resulted in any of the fatalities - all the fire fatalities were in Texas. --JForget 01:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good Friday

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I know it's not official. I know it's not been circulated yet. But, per common tradition of using associated holidays, then name "Good Friday Outbreak" fits. Palm Sunday, Easter, New Year's Eve and Veterans Day have all been used historically. Off the top of my head, only Memorial Day and April Fools have been directly associated with a major outbreak and not been used. Just my opinion. -- HurricaneERIC - Class of '08: XVII Maius MMVIII 19:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The NWS in Nashville refers to this outbreak as the Good Friday outbreak so there is some usage of the name. Cyclonebiskit 20:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
It would be usable for the second day of the outbreak from a local perspective. But in the grand scheme, it is not an appropriate name for the article, as there was significant activity from a separate round of storms (in the same system) on Thursday night as well. If it all happened Friday and Friday night, then that name would be a good title for the article. (I did create a redirect with that name though) Easter Weekend was considered as an eventual name, but today was a total bust. CrazyC83 (talk) 04:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on April 2009 tornado outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Tornado outbreak of April 9–11, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tornado_outbreak_of_April_9–11,_2009&oldid=1202632128"