Wikipedia

Talk:Tornado outbreak of May 10–13, 2010

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Referencing issues

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We've got problems. In most of our recent tornado outbreak articles, the references aren't "filled out"...for example, the difference in these:

Filled out:

  • Corfidi, Steve (2007-05-04). "Tornado Watch 227". Storm Prediction Center. Retrieved 2010-01-17.

Not filled out:

In order for articles to pass GA or FA, the references need to be filled out. This is a problem Tornado ran into on its recent Featured Article Review. Thegreatdr is correct when he says WikiProject Severe Weather needs to focus on quality. I'd really like to see outbreak articles getting to GA and FA.

Ok, sorry. Just my "rant of the day" so to speak. Let's all try to work on referencing. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 04:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unconfirmed ratings

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Some IP already placed ratings for some of the OKC and surroundings tornadoes including the Choctaw and Norman ones but no PNS has been issued and KOCO and KFOR does not have the ratings as well. Don't put ratings based only on estimations by the storm chasers or weather presenters - Mike Morgan and David Payne at KFOR (and probably the other ones at KOCO and KWTV as well) often brings up ratings estimations by just see the size of the funnel or initial damage observations well before the actual storm. Only NWS Tulsa and NWS Wichita have ratings confirmed. So the last edits were reverted.JForget 07:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Norman put out their preliminaries since then, from what I can tell. On a different note, what do we do with all those tornadoes that the Goodland office doesn't seem to want to survey? This is two outbreaks in a row they didn't do a damage survey on the tornadoes in their area, so I don't see how we can "confirm" those tornadoes. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 21:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
It does seem Goodland (and Dodge City) don't want to confirm their tornadoes? Of course, they will most likely be almost all EF0 due to lack of damage, but we cannot confirm them without a backing source. It is not uncommon in these small rural offices though - June 2009 (which had no major outbreaks but steady activity throughout) went from 110 or so initially confirmed tornadoes to 270 in Storm Data as a result. CrazyC83 (talk) 03:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Move request

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago10 comments7 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved to Early-May 2010 tornado outbreak. There's general consensus that Oklahoma should go from the title, and if so, we need a specification because there are other May 2010 tornado outbreak. I used "Early-May" instead of "Early May" for consistency with various articles titled "Late-May 2010 tornado outbreak" and similar, though I am not sure whether the hyphen is grammatically correct. Ucucha 13:33, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


May 2010 Oklahoma tornado outbreak → May 2010 tornado outbreak — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

About a third of the tornadoes occurred outside of Oklahoma. TheAustinMan (talk) 20:37, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I would tend to support this move, but think the target page should be Early May 2010 tornado outbreak, because there will likely be another outbreak later in May, and should that happen it would be nice to have May 2010 tornado outbreak to use as a disambiguation page (which it is currently being used as). Ks0stm (T•C•G) 21:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


  • It would agree with naming it Early May 2010 tornado outbreak, but I think that decision would have to be put on-hold until another tornado outbreak occurs in May. The name might also be confused with the April-May 2010 tornado outbreak, which also happened in early May. I'd keep with proposing the name change to May 2010 tornado outbreak. It would also occur to me I would have to tweak the article up more. May 10 was the primary date of tornadic activity, but the same storm system also produced more tornadoes over the next few days. TheAustinMan (talk) 21:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I can see the wisdom in keeping the May 12 tornadoes on there, but the tornadoes on May 13th may be overkill if there's not more than two. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 22:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'm on the fence. There is a good point made in that a lot of the tornadoes happened in neighboring states. However, the case for leaving Oklahoma in there is because nearly all the major tornadoes happened in that state. As for the date point, not necessary now as it wouldn't be disambiguated, but if another outbreak happens later in May (likely, but not imminent - then again, from 2005 to 2009, only one of those years had a major outbreak in May beyond the 15th), then make a second move. CrazyC83 (talk) 23:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

End date

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As has just been done, I believe this outbreak needs cut off sometime after the 12th, as the original system moved east and stopped producing tornadoes. The tornadoes that followed were a separate system that followed closely on the heels of the first system, and do not warrant the continuation of the outbreak. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 23:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fatalities

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The article states that there were two fatalities associated with this outbreak, but it was widely reported on May 10 that there were at least 5 fatalities. On May 11, the media reported at least 7. Here is one article reporting 7 fatalities: http://newsok.com/oklahoma-tornadoes-seventh-tornado-fatality-reported/article/3460519?custom_click=headlines_widget 68.97.3.97 (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, I'm not sure what to do in this situation, because the official reports at this point indicate two people are dead as a result of the storms. When the National Climatic Data Center's storm data for the event is released, the final total of deaths can be determined, but at this point, sources contradict each other. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 21:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
SPC now shows 2 fatalities for the Moore/Choctaw tornado. [1] JForget 17:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tornado outbreak of May 10–13, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tornado outbreak of May 10–13, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tornado_outbreak_of_May_10–13,_2010&oldid=1200357770"