This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Masem, regarding your revert: The "slip opinion" and "preliminary print" are two separate things. The first is the version released immediately in June 2022. The second is a version posted at some later time, with page numbers reflecting official U.S. Reports citation, and with minor revisions, but still not final. A recent edit by an IP editor (Special:Diff/1194124172) changed the link from the slip opinion to the preliminary print. My edit (Special:Diff/1194207407) was solely to correct the fact that the IP editor changed the link but didn't change the link text to match.
As for the IP editor's revision in the first place, personally I think it was a constructive edit. The alternative, which I'd be equally ok with, is to include both the old link and the new link. Either way, I hope you'll agree the current state before my edit / after your revert is incorrect. Adumbrativus (talk) 07:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
