This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Total loss article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
editThis page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Equivalent?
editIs there an equivalent in medical or life insurance? --ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 23:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- You mean, if an insurance company will prefer to pay for funeral arrangements instead of paying treatments because it's cheaper? :-S 83.251.110.137 (talk) 09:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
changed the intro sentence
editAdditional references need to be located, but to total or not is not a statutorily defined process as far as I know. It's a subject that often results in debate between the insured and the insurer. Suppose current market value on your car is $10,000 and repair cost is $8,500, but the car in its damaged state is worth $3,000 which results in net cost of $7,000 rather than $8,500 if it was to total the car instead of repair. Insurers want to push for total loss in this case. Obviously the salvage value is not a dead on quote, so its not always a black and white process. I used Carsdirect.com as a reference. Its not a great reference, but its better than what we had, I think. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Article is unduly restrictive to auto insurance
editThe concept of writing off total losses considerably predates the invention of the automobiles. Shipping, for instance.--Mike18xx (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I have rewritten the lede to address this concern.--Mike18xx (talk) 00:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please use reliable sources and avoid self published disreputable sources. Forum posts that you've freshly inserted fall under this. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 03:52, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
What about aircraft?
editThis concept is also used for aircraft however nomencion of it in the article. Can anyone add a section with supporting citations? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Just did that, using information from the "hull loss", wikiarticle. Regards, DPdH (talk) 22:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)