Talk:Touch My Body/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk2me) 05:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Infobox
- No issues
- Lead
- ...held throughout 2009-10. – Make it "held throughout 2009 and 2010."
- Background and release
- ...and to digital outlets on March 24. – Specify year
- Composition
- According to the sheet music published at Musicnotes.com by W.B.M. Music Corporation... – It's actually Sony/ATV Music Publishing
- The song follows in the chord progression of Bm7–Am7–Gmaj7[22] – Add period at end
- Critical reception
- No issues
- Chart performance
- No issues
- Remixes
- No issues
- Music video
- No issues
- Live performances
- No issues
- Cover version
- No issues
- Track listings and formats
- No issues
- Credits and personnel
- No issues
- Charts and certifications
- No issues
- See also
- No issues
- References
- Reference 15 – The Daily Telegraph is already wiki-linked in Reference 13
- References 20, 23 – Fix format
Overall review
editAfter thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. This article is very close to reaching good article status and has only minor mistakes keeping it away from it. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or discuss items you believe do not GA status until a consensus is reached. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Done! Thanks for the review :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 20:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Good job on responding to the issues quickly. Since all of them have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:26, 8 August 2011 (UTC)