Talk:Townsville Ring Road
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | The contents of the Douglas Arterial Road page were merged into Townsville Ring Road on 20 Mar 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
thoughts on moving this page to a new page called The Ring Road, Townsville and Thuringowa
editcan i have some thoughts on moving this page to one called something along the lines of The Ring Road, Townsville & Thuringowa as this road is not called the Townsville ring road, that was the projects name. The main roads own website calls it the Ring road as does every sign in Townsville and Thuringowa, so any thoughts would be great, i'll give it about 2 weeks or so and if no ideas come in i will make the move. thanks Thuringowacityrep 12:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't worry mate, i moved the page to Townsville/Thuringowa Ring Road as that is the officially listed name of the project on the Main roads website. Intially the project itself was the Townsville Ring Road and that was my reason for calling the article that in the first place. However, even though the article is now listed as Townsville/Thuringowa Ring Road, i will change the links in several pages in the next coming weeks, in the mean time, the links will still be "Townsville Ring Road" - Gertzy 14:00 (UTC) 13th April, 2007.
Cool thanks im happy with this outcome...good to see you back on here again
take care Thuringowacityrep 01:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editI propose that Douglas Arterial Road be merged into Townsville Ring Road. Douglas Arterial Road was built as stage 1 of the Townsville Ring Road and thus there is no longer a need for a separate article. Both articles are in need of updating and it would be counter-productive to do each in isolation. Downsize43 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was no comment by any editor. Downsize43 (talk) 00:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
No discussion after 6 weeks.
Unexplained bulk removal of content
edit@Evad37: An IP editor recently removed much of the content (admitted somewhat outdated) from this article without explanation. I note that he has a history of such actions. Please have someone review the changes and decide what if any is worth saving. Regards Downsize43 (talk) 00:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Downsize43: Thanks for the heads-up. Looks like some parts should be restored, and merged with the content the IP added in the same edit. I'll take a look later, maybe tomorrow, if nobody else gets to it first. - Evad37 [talk] 13:24, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Done Could still use quite a bit of cleanup and some more refs, but at least the content is there again. - Evad37 [talk] 04:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
