 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Merge
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- No Consensus — Keithbob • Talk • 21:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
While it may seem that the Toyota Revo and the Toyota Kijang are one same vehicle, the Revo is still a separate vehicle, given that this version of the Toyota AUV is designed for Philippine markets, and, eventually, earning its distinct Filipino identity.
Kenshinflyer (talk) 05:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Disagree entirely. I propose a (careful) merge with Kijang, as per Wikipedia Project Automobile guidelines. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 05:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- I agree on that. Both the Malay and Philippine variants are essentially the same banana, so it makes little sense to make a separate article about the Revo. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Agree with original premise, "the Revo is still a separate vehicle, given that this version of the Toyota AUV is designed for Philippine markets, and, eventually, earning its distinct Filipino identity." --Degen Earthfast (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- How has it earned such an identity? The only difference is in badging and similar superficialities. The car has the same chassis codes (beginning with the original KF10), parts are all interchangable, and it was designed by Toyota in Japan especially for developing markets. It was not designed specifically for any particular market, but for a whole range of markets with similar conditions, needs, and means. Mr.choppers | ✎ 10:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support merger as per Mr.choppers. OSX (talk • contributions) 12:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
AUV
editIs Asian Utility Vehicle a common term? I have not heard it before in Australia. If it is a common term then someone should create an article on it (perhaps as part of SUV or 4WD). Stepho-wrs (talk) 07:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- In countries like the Philippines, Indonesia and some other places, yes; they are similar to SUVs, but they seem to be more light-duty and mostly don't offer four-wheel drive. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)