Talk:Trackless train
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 193.63.174.115 in topic Dead links...
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Land train page were merged into Trackless train. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merging Land train into Trackless train
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The result was merge into Trackless train. -- Bonadea (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
This isn't in any way different than land train, and the articles should be merged ASAP. --82.128.240.106 19:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Will do it tomorrow if I remember. The question is: which title is to stay? --Bobyllib 02:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, please merge. Both "land train" and "trackless train" get about 20,000 Google hits - crude method but it seems the terms are roughly equally common. The Trackless train article has been around for a couple of years longer, but that's not really a criterion either. "Land train" can be used for a very long truck, I think, so maybe "trackless" is the less ambiguous term. --Bonadea (talk) 08:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Dead links...
editI think this must be a new record, out of the many cited links at the bottom of the page, only one appears to still be valid (I won't spoil the surprise...). Can we get updates, please? 193.63.174.115 (talk) 11:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)