Talk:Trades Union Certification Officer
Latest comment: 3 years ago by ThurstonMitchell in topic Update request
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Factual changes made by The Certification Office. Please do not change or revert back.
Call us on 03301093602 if you want to make any changes.
Certification Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/certification-officer
Update request
editPlease can someone explain why the update has been reverted again on 28 February?
kind Regards
Shanta Hello there
I updated this page twice recently and both times it got reverted back to the old version. The original text is incorrect particularly with regards to listing applications and the Certification Office want to correct this and update the page generally to be more helpful.
Kind Regards Shanta — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.126.68 (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- @ThurstonMitchell: just as an FYI since I think they're talking to you. Reversions could probably use a bit more detail in the edit summaries. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- I’ve been following the lead of another editor who has reverted the anonymous editor’s revisions. Look at the history and speak with them about why they reverte. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- That was @Gjs238:, who can hopefully expand, however, @ThurstonMitchell:, if you're going to revert edits then you should be able to elucidate why you did so on its own merits, in case the original editor's decision was flawed (or even if not, so you can explain why) Nosebagbear (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- I’ve been following the lead of another editor who has reverted the anonymous editor’s revisions. Look at the history and speak with them about why they reverte. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speak to that editor.
- my last revert was because you delete the references and categories, IIRC without looking at the article so it appears to be vandalism or disruptive editing. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)