This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some sources say departure from Lisbon was on November 27. Others say November 29. What is the source of the discrepancy? And which one is it? Please provide source. 78.100.28.192 (talk) 21:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article uses both John and João, and it's not clear why; similarly, Prince John and Dom João. Could/should this not be standardised, to avoid confusion? On a related but different point, it also refers to him as John VI and 'King' already when he ruled as Prince Regent and there in fact was no king (AFAIK). I've placed clarify tags to flag up these issues, hoping that someone in the know can correct and/or comment. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
