This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'd like to hear opinions from anyone following this page whether the definition seems adequate. "Has the capacity" (to do something in the future) and "revolutionize" along with other vague or undefined terms seem unlikely to enable NSF reviewers to successfully assess the revolutionary potential of proposed research, and thus: the ability of NSF to reliably support the stated goals. Thoughts? BurntSynapse (talk) 23:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)BurntSynapseReply
