Talk:Transformity

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

NOR

edit
  • I believe that this is an accurate statement of the energy transformation ratio with appropriate citations. If an expert in the field belives that this is not accurate then they are welcome to correct my interpretation Sholto Maud 06:09, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
It might be accurate or not. The problem is that all these words (emergy, transformity, etc.) have been used by a handfull of people, albeit well cited and referenced, and to a good purpose. This is why alot of people view them as OR. 81.219.225.4 16:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC) this was me, not logged in Karol 16:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

There's something fishy here. All those references in a single-page article? I say copy-pasted article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.195.42.2 (talk) 14:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

NPOV

edit

I added the NPOV tag because significant criticisms of the concept of transformity and the entire field that produced it are not reported in the article. See Talk:Emergy#Neutrality. Flying Jazz (talk) 16:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Transformity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply