primarysources tag

edit

I've removed the primarysources tag. This journal went out of business in 1938. My guess is that that was before the Internet, so the reference website is not affiliated to it. If you look, you'll find that it is at a perfectly respectable university and is a valid source. Please take some care before adding tags like this to articles. Filiocht | The kettle's on 08:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

capitalization

edit

The journal's name is properly spelled with lowercase t: transition. The article should reflect that. Languagehat (talk) 20:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

References

The links to the references don't work

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Transition (literary journal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Transition (literary journal) (1948–1950) into Transition (literary journal) (1927-1938)

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge Transition (literary journal) (1948–1950) into Transition (literary journal) (1927-1938), for former being a short article of a closely related topic better discussed in context. Klbrain (talk) 11:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Basically just one magazine, with a period where publication was suspended. No reason why this stub could not be merged into Transition (literary journal) (1927-1938). Randykitty (talk) 13:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm open to merging. To explain, the reason why I created a separate page instead of a new section of the original is because from 1948-1950, the journal was completely separated from the team they started with in 1927. It had a different stated purpose and a different audience base. If you think that this isn't enough for a separate page though, I understand! Sabrinawaite (talk) 13:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Well, the very first line of the 48-50 article says that it was a "revival" of the older journal, indicating some continuity. This is indeed also what the source says. That after a break of 10 years (with a World War in between) the team is different, is not too surprising perhaps. --Randykitty (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
    That's very fair on the point of revival. Specifically with the team, the Jolases sold the right to Duthuit instead of normal team/time turnover Sabrinawaite (talk) 15:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 11:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply