Talk:Translational glycobiology
Translational glycobiology received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Translational glycobiology.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 September 2021 and 3 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gnurwono. Peer reviewers: Nistoner.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
diagnostics
editarticle could maybe use a section on biomarkers/diagnostics... Jytdog (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Peer review
edit- Transcluded from Wikipedia:Peer_review/Translational_glycobiology/archive1
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because this isn't my field of expertise, and thus far I've been the only contributor. Considering the somewhat esoteric nature of the subject, I am looking to have my additions checked over and possibly improved upon by editors more familiar with the field. Thanks! ~ Erick Shepherd • (Talk) • 11:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Good work Erick Shepherd! I've done a little copyediting. Overall the article is clear and precise, with relevant examples. Useful additions would be:
- Some history (e.g. when was the first?)
- Some comparison (e.g. are there significant differences to other drugs?)
- Non-drug uses (e.g. diagnostics, biotech uses?)
- Hope that helpsT.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 01:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Good work Erick Shepherd! I've done a little copyediting. Overall the article is clear and precise, with relevant examples. Useful additions would be: