This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Which statements are false or misleading? Kitplane01 (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Actually that summary was for Tandem rotors, and I forgot to change it when I copied it to the edit summary for this article. This is the relevant one from my first revert: "article not about tandem rotors". Also, whenever you make claims (especially as in Tandem rotors), you need to cite from reliable sources. You've been on WP far too long to to have to be told to cite your sources by now. - BillCJ (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)