Talk:Transvestism and Transsexualism in Modern Society

(Redirected from Talk:Transvestism and Transsexuality in Modern Society)
Latest comment: 7 months ago by PrimalMustelid in topic Did you know nomination

Sources to add

edit

* https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003297499-25/former-guildford-hotel-kit-heyam

Lajmmoore (talk) 09:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 17:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
'Rainbow plaque' commemorating conference

Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 11:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Transvestism and Transsexuality in Modern Society; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   I strongly prefer ALT1, but could it be reworded? Something like, "...the first known uses of the phrases "gender alignment", and "trans" as an umbrella term for transgender people, were at the 1974 Transvestism and Transsexuality in Modern Society conference in Leeds?" Also, the photo isn't terribly clear at 120px - I'm guessing there are no alternatives? Prosperosity (talk) 04:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks @Prosperosity: - your suggested wording was clearer, but I think the article refers to the specific phrase trans.people (I think transgender dates to 1971 in the UK), I didn't include it in a the article because of this difference. How about:
  • @Lajmmoore: This sounds better! How about rewording the sentence as ""trans.people" to describe transgender people" or something similar, like changing the word order? The phrase "trans.people for transgender people" is a little hard to parse.
  • Would you be okay with no photo for the nomination? Otherwise maybe a photo from the mid-1970s of the hotel can be sourced and added to the article? (I'm guessing photos from the event are either lost to time or have no chance of being CC-BY licensed). --Prosperosity (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
ALT3 "... early use of the phrases "gender alignment", and "trans.people" to describe transgender people, were at the 1974 Transvestism and Transsexuality in Modern Society conference in Leeds?"
Looks great! --Prosperosity (talk) 20:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • In terms of an image, I can't see an openly licensed 1970s one either on Commons or on Geograph. What I can do is see if I can take a better one of the plaque? I'd really prefer it to have an image, as they do create more visibility. I'll ping you again, once I have seen if I can get a better picture. If not we'll have to go without Lajmmoore (talk) 07:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  •  
    Temporary rainbow plaque for Transvestism and Transsexuality conference held at University of Leeds in 1974, plaque made in 2018 4
    Hey Prosperosity, I took some new images, but the temporary plaque is now peeling, so although in higher resolution, it doesn't look great. Thoughts? Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Urgh, unfortunately that doesn't look any better (and it's still not very legible at 100px). Even if we list it with the photo, I don't think the person who chooses the DYK photo would select either plaque photo. I'd strongly recommend we go forward without any photo - is that alright? --Prosperosity (talk) 20:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure, not much else to do! Lajmmoore (talk) 18:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just adding a note that it would be great if it could be used on 15/16/17 March - the anniversary of the conference! Lajmmoore (talk) 10:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Great, in that case the DYK is all ready to go. --Prosperosity (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

On this day

edit

Added a nomination for this at OTD for 15 March Lajmmoore (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply