Talk:Traveling Salesmen

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleTraveling Salesmen has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starTraveling Salesmen is part of the The Office (American season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 29, 2012Good article nomineeListed
January 5, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Reference to 40-Year Old Virgin?

edit

Is there a reference to the 40-Year Old Virgin when Michael is using his computer to talk dirty to Jim and Pam? He makes it say "Me so horny, me love you long time" Doesn't he say that in The 40 Year Old Virgin? It might be something else, it sounds so familiar.

It's a bit of a common phrase.

The long section headers...

edit

...are unnecessary as the preceeding paragraph now has all the nicknames, which although funny weren't really a major component of the show.

--66.233.54.205 20:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dwight and Jim's friendship

edit

I think this is an important episode that shows Dwight actually cares about Jim and vice versa. When Dwight is leaving the office, Jim greets Dwight in a friendly manner then Dwight hugs Jim. Karen asks Jim what happened on the sales call. I'm trying to find a reference so I can put it in the article.

Fool me once...

edit

Michael's interview "Michael Scott: Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike three."... Could that be a play off a similar Bushism?

Photo

edit

Could we possibly get a screenshot of Jim's picture with himself and Dwight "from the old days"?- JustPhil  15:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dunder Mifflin

edit

I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 16:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Page Title

edit

This page can be moved to simply Traveling Salesmen (i.e. no parenthetical) as it isn't being used for anything. 138.69.160.1 13:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with this method. If most episodes use the parenthetical, then using it in a search term should allow one to find all related articles. It could be argued there are more efficient methods of finding a particular episode, but applying a policy of naming consistency will allow the most basic search method. --LeyteWolfer 03:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Traveling Salesmen and The Return

edit

I believe these were taped at the same time, and both were directed by Daniels. Schur is credited along with Stupnitzky and Eisenberg, who work as a team. Anyone know if Schur wrote one "episode" alone, while the duo wrote the other? 98.150.201.231 (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Office US S03E13.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Office US S03E13.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Traveling Salesmen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 20:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    "The old picture of Jim and Dwight was a photoshop of Krasinski's real high school photograph with a 1991 image of Rainn Wilson while he was on tour with an acting company." Maybe re-word? I'm not sure I understood who's head was photoshoped onto what.
    "In his review of the third season, Travis Fickett of IGN highlighted a scene of the episode; he commented, 'Watching Andy slowly meltdown when he can't find his cell phone is one of the better moments of the season.'" Didn't this take place during the events of "The Return (The Office)"
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Ref 13, OfficeTally is citing an official NBC document, but it is a fan cite. Might I suggest you cite the actual NBC press release? The only thing that isn't there is the url, which seems to be broken. (Just because I'm nice, the citation template would look like: {{cite press release |title=Jan. 17, 2007 Press Release ("Traveling Salesmen")| archiveurl =http://www.officetally.com/the-office-nielsen-ratings/2| archivedate =10 October 2008|url= http://www.nbcumv.com/entertainment/release_detail.nbc/entertainment-20070117000000-nbcratingsresults.html|publisher=NBC|date=27 February 2007|accessdate=23 January 2012-01}})
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Thorough coverage, no sign of trivia
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Neural POV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    No edit warring
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Two pictures, properly tagged. I really like finding pictures for the infobox. Maybe add one of Dwight and Angela together or the scene where Dwight leaves and note how it relates to the episode
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for the response delay. I have implemented your recommendations (including uploading a new screenshot; let me know what you think). Thanks for the review! Ruby 2010/2013 02:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well done, I pass this!--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Traveling Salesmen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Traveling Salesmen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply