Talk:Treaty of Amsterdam

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This article is a bit waffly. Rollo 18:55, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Success of the Amsterdam Treaty

edit

I'm not an expert so I hesitate to amend thta text my self. This is my concern: "The Amsterdam Treaty did not settle all institutional questions once and for all". This is a sweet way to say that many of the decisions taken by this treaty were unmanageable and that they were to be addressed soon, like it was during the Nice Treaty. This artcile lacks of a criticism section, no ? Lvr 12:49, 14 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

"Amsterdam Treaty v. Treaty of Amsterdam"

edit

I reverted a recent move of this article. I don't think it should be moved until there's consensus to do so. Fyi the current Google search results produce the following:

  • "Rome Treaty" 94,100
  • "Treaty of Rome" 515,000
  • "Amsterdam Treaty" 249,000
  • "Treaty of Amsterdam" 243,000
  • "Maastricht Treaty" 674,000
  • "Treaty of Maastricht" 301,000
  • "Treaty of Nice" 253,000
  • "Nice Treaty" 187,000
  • "Lisbon Treaty" 2,050,000
  • "Treaty of Lisbon" 1,600,000

This vindicates the name used on Wikipedia with the exception of Lisbon. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 00:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Amsterdam Treaty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Treaty of Amsterdam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply