Talk:Treaty of Ciudad Juárez/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Noraft in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC) Links check out. Article looks good. I did a bit of copyediting. Will go over it a little more carefully in a second pass, and if everything checks out, should be able to promote it. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I added a [citation needed] tag. If you can put a citation there, we'll be ready to promote. Nice article. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I must have overlooked it. The info is also in the sources already in the article. I added the relevant inline citations.radek (talk) 10:13, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Well written, well covered. Let me know when you nominate it for FA.
ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 12:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply