Talk:Treaty of Warsaw (1920)

A fact from Treaty of Warsaw (1920) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the April 1920 Polish-Ukrainian agreement became the legal justification of the Kiev Offensive against Bolshevik Russia?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/August.

Wikipedia

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine Mid‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / Polish

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reliability of a citation

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Note #3 references an article at polonica.net [1]. The home page of this site contains numerous disturbing images and language that should probably disqualify it as a reference. Novickas 14:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Fixed and replied on your talk page. Note that unreliable websites can reproduce reliable articles, too.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 15:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

As to the reliability of Patryk Dole - apart from his appearance at polonica.net - comments at [2] Novickas 22:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

First, you misunderstand the purpose of RfArb and evidence section. It is not a place for such discussions; this talk page or user talk pages should be used instead. As for your findings, they are interesting. Indeed, a person of rather low reliability, alas his views on the present politics does not make his historical article necessarily wrong (although it is certainly no better then any external links, which are defined as sources of low reliability). Would you have any critical reviews of his article, or did you find any specific inaccuracies in his article that would suggest we discard this article?--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 22:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The place for this discussion to continue is Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, since Dole is cited in several other articles. Novickas 12:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Certainly that would be a better avenue, yes.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 13:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Discussion opened at [3] Novickas 15:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Note #19 also appears to reference the polonica.net article by P. Doyle. Novickas 15:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Removed. Anna M. Cienciala is certainly reliable and enough for that sentence.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 15:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

B-class review

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 15:48, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Treaty of Warsaw (1920). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic