Talk:Treehouse of Horror XXV/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Johanna in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Third on my "to review" list. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Comments from reviewer

edit

@The Almightey Drill: Nice work! Just a few things to fix before I can pass. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 04:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@The Almightey Drill: Good work! I'm satisfied enough to pass now. If you get a chance, could you review one of my Veronica Mars articles up at GAN. If you can't, it's okay. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 23:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: