This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trello article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trello Marketing Removal
editAll content removed was from the companies own website. It is advertising/marketing when the companies plants information in wikipedia and then uses their own website to back it up.
Thereandnot (talk) 13:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not quite. If it's a direct copy of their text, then it's a copyright violation and should be removed, otherwise. it's just supported by a primary source, which isn't ideal, but not wrong. I have a serious problem with your editing though. I think you should avoid editing articles by your competitors until you have a better understanding of how Wikipedia works. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- These claims are not verafiable anywhere expect their own website. Small companies like these can claim anything on their website and it is not true. These are Self-Published sources WP:BLPSPS.
- Competitors? What the hell are you taking about?! You are showing bad faith(WP:BADFAITH). I am not a competitor to this company. I am just calling this advertising like it is!
- Thereandnot (talk) 14:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry. I confused you with an editor who has been complaining about articles like this and gutting them. Since you have cleared up my confusion, I need to clear yours up. Since this is not a biography of a living person, BLPSPS does not apply, WP:PRIMARY does: "Unless restricted by another policy, reliable primary sources may be used in Wikipedia; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them". The material is not being misused as far as I can see, but perhaps you can explain it. I have restored the material while we discuss this. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- I edited the article to make it seem less deceptive to users. There is a healthy skepticism around these numbers they are pushing. They are the only ones reporting them. Thereandnot (talk) 02:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- I noticed. I would argue it's poor writing as well, but you had an agenda and you can have your way this way too. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Once again, I have no interest in this software or its competitors. However, I will rip down anything that seems like small or large corporate manipulation of people or violation of neutrality. If you feel like you need a neutral third party weighing in on a situation that is similar(corporation posting information about itself evidenced only by claims on its own website), post on my wall and I will step in with consistency.Thereandnot (talk) 23:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- I noticed. I would argue it's poor writing as well, but you had an agenda and you can have your way this way too. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- I edited the article to make it seem less deceptive to users. There is a healthy skepticism around these numbers they are pushing. They are the only ones reporting them. Thereandnot (talk) 02:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
2015 news item to consider for use
editI don't have time to contribute based on this source at this time ... but can later ... unless you do it first :-) — "Trello: Your digital replacement for sticky notes and whiteboards?" at http://www.techrepublic.com/article/trello-your-digital-replacement-for-sticky-notes-and-whiteboards/ . --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Impowement
editHow to be take to the organisation page to add members click on the member tab 158.62.57.34 (talk) 06:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Proposed system
editArchitecture of trello app 206.84.224.97 (talk) 09:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)