Talk:Trevor (The X-Files)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Grapple X in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 00:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I never understood why I didn't like this one. Larry Zito walks through walls, and it still doesn't work for me. :(

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    "The episode was originally supposed to be set in Oklahoma]] ," -> Is Oklahoma meant to be linked here or not? The comma needs to come directly after the word either way.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
    The usual set of sources, so there's nothing wrong here.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
    Seems good. Anything in the Examinations book for this one?
Got it!
  1. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Not a problem.
  2. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Grand.
  3. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    I'm not sold on the worth of that screenshot; I'd consider that maybe something showing the special effects work would be better suited as it's discussed in both the production and reception sections, and is therefore more relevant to the article. I'm also genuinely surprised we don't have any free images of John Diehl, given that the man is in just about everything. Ah well.
  4. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Just want to stick this on hold to see about the image, but apart from that we're looking good to go here. GRAPPLE X 00:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
    OK, I went with a pic of the guy with his face burnt off, since Cinefantastique praised it in a review. I believe that's all.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Happy days. Ready to pass. Well done! GRAPPLE X 03:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply