Talk:Trey Burke/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Moisejp in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Moisejp (talk · contribs) 07:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. I'll probably be able to finish it within the next few days. Moisejp (talk) 07:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

No disambiguation links or dead links. Moisejp (talk) 07:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Well written, follows MOS,
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Refs all check out, no OR.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Broad and focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    No images
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Very good article. Congratulations! It is now a GA. Moisejp (talk) 06:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply