Talk:Triaenops menamena

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Triaenops menamena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Just two comments

• angular process is red-linked and unexplained
  • Added a little explanation.
• In the lead, you illustrate the sizes with wing lengths — I'd expect total length to be the more obvious figure, but I know nothing about bats.
  • In bats, forearm length is among the most prominent measurements. I can also replace it with total length if needed, though; it's already in the table. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A featured article with no image?

I'm just wondering how this happened. Most featured articles have a header/main image of some sort. Like one of these. Dogman15 (talk) 09:48, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

A paper on echolocation calls...

...is available over there. If somebody (Ucucha ?) is interested :) Totodu74 (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Feel free to reuse this edit on fr:WP.

@Ucucha: I translated "your" article on fr:WP, thanks a lot for this high-quality content! Totodu74 (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Triaenops menamena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612095934/http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/15900_z08n3a10.pdf to http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/15900_z08n3a10.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090718195034/http://redpath-staff.mcgill.ca/Samonds/PDFS/11%20Samonds%202007.pdf to http://redpath-staff.mcgill.ca/Samonds/PDFS/11%20Samonds%202007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)