Talk:Trial of Mihailović et al./Archive 1

Archive 1

List of the accused

Is the list of the accused in the order the Communists presented them in?--Methodius 12:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes they are. They are in the order in which their names would have been read out. I am not sure if this indicates the penalties they were assigned to be given. :) Why, do you want to rearrnage them in another way?--As286 12:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC) --As286 18:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Yes, that makes sense. I was just wondering why Moljević was given such significance.--Methodius 12:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

---

Moved the sources tag to the abuse of process part, as that is really where proper sources need to be quoted. The rest of the article is simply a retelling of the official proceedings which are publicly available on the web site quoted in the references.--As286 18:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

---

Retrial was not called for only by the Serbs. As a matter of fact, a number of them would very much like him to stay convicted. There were Cetniks elsewhere in ex-YU (Aleksander Bajt in Slovenia, for instance). The Americans have also protested in 1946 and so have the French. Also, parts of the ex-YU population believe that the case ought to be revised on the account of other crimes that were not properly dealt with such as various war crimes that were not in the indictment.--As286 18:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC) --As286 18:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I guess the section should be elaborated a little then. The calls for rehabilitation of the late 1940s, and the calls for rehabilitation in the 2000s are both significant, but vastly different in nature. For instance, the French and Americans would probably not be very supportive of such an idea today. Regards. --Thewanderer 18:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

That is probably true. Corrected accordingly.--As286 18:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

---

If you are putting the NPOV tag, please explain what it is that you are disputing. As mentioned, the article is based almost exclusively on the proceedings published in 1946 and contains no opinions, except for one in the section on abuse of proceedings.--As286 18:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Appeared to be tortured?

The source provided for the absurd claim cannot be viewed as reliable or unbiased. The book was written decades after the fact, and contains an opinion from an entity not present at the proceedings. The opinion is not referenced or supported by other sources. It was the first mention of torture, as the accusation has never been made previously. 69 journalists attended the proceedings, which were broadcasted live across the country. Had he been tortured or mistreated, he could have easily stated so without any possible cover-up. Moreover, he explicitly stated he was treated well in detainment. Moreover, he was found guilty of ALL 47 charges. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clicker1 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

This article has to be deleted.I t describes a war criminal as a hero.

This article has to be deleted.It describes a war criminal as a hero. The neutrality of this article is disputed, and contains unverified claims. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.29.142.4 (talk) 10:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC). His war crimes charges stand. General Dragoljub Mihailovic handed Partisans over to the Axis who immediately executed that is murdered them, and not a traitor what else?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Trial of Mihailović et al.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070212225831/http://trial-mihailovic-1946.org:80/ to http://trial-mihailovic-1946.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Trial of Mihailović et al.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110725181512/http://www.filmskenovosti.rs/sudjenjeDraziMihajlovicu.htm to http://www.filmskenovosti.rs/sudjenjeDraziMihajlovicu.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)