Talk:Trial of Satanta and Big Tree

Disputed tag - first trial of chief in state court

edit

Menominee Chief Oshkosh had been tried and acquitted in 1830. See Wisconsin magazine of history: Volume 86, number 2, winter 2002-2003, "Judge James Duane Doty and Wisconsin's First Court", Patrick J. Jung. GregJackP Boomer! 16:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

In response to GregJackP above, Wisconsin was not a state in 1830. It was a part of Michigan Territory until 1836, and not a state until 1848. Another Wisconsin Indian, named Maw Zaw Mah Nee Kah, son of a Ho-Chunk chief, was tried in Brown County District Court, in 1837, for the murder of interpreter Pierre Pauquette, but this too was not a state court. The records of the Maw Zaw Mah Nee Kah trial are UW Green Bay Area Research Center, Brown County Series 65, Box 16 (31), Folder 55, Case File 1576, and are cited in Martin Zanger's chapter on Pauquette (spelled Paquette), in the Anthology of Western Great Lakes Indian History. Note that several references erroneously claim that Maw Zaw Mah Nee Kah was either acquitted, pardoned, or even executed. He was in fact convicted, but this was overturned by the Wisconsin Territorial Supreme Court due to several irregularities in the trial, including the court declaring itself a federal circuit court, which did not then exist in Wisconsin. [1]

Neither trial contradicts the claim of Satanta and Big Tree being the first American Indians tried in a US State court.

References

  1. ^ Fixico, Donald L, ed. (1987). An Anthology of Western Great Lakes Indian History. American Indian Studies. pp. 330–335.